Most cafeteria options are not particularly nutritious or accessible to students with dietary restrictions.
This reason fails to support the claim that all students could be able to afford a cafeteria lunch regardless of their socioeconomic class. It instead suggests a potential barrier for some students in accessing nutritious and suitable food options in the cafeteria.
Which reason fails to support the claim in a meaningful way?
(1 point)
Responses
All students could be able to afford a cafeteria lunch regardless of their socioeconomic class.
All students could be able to afford a cafeteria lunch regardless of their socioeconomic class.
Students who eat consistent meals report that they are more mentally healthy and less likely to become involved in conflicts.
Students who eat consistent meals report that they are more mentally healthy and less likely to become involved in conflicts.
Teachers report that students who eat lunch perform better during class than students who skip lunch.
Teachers report that students who eat lunch perform better during class than students who skip lunch.
Most cafeteria options are not particularly nutritious or accessible to students with dietary restrictions.
1 answer
1 answer