Duplicate Question
The question on this page has been marked as a duplicate question.
Original Question
Which property of exponents was used to generate the equivalent expression 3^14 from 3^5/3^−9?(1 point) Responses only the Powe...Question
Which property of exponents was used to generate the equivalent expression 314 from 353−9 ?(1 point)
Responses
only the Power Rule of Exponents
only the Power Rule of Exponents
the Property of Negative Exponents and the Product Rule of Exponents
the Property of Negative Exponents and the Product Rule of Exponents
only the Product Rule of Exponents
only the Product Rule of Exponents
only the Property of Negative Exponents
Responses
only the Power Rule of Exponents
only the Power Rule of Exponents
the Property of Negative Exponents and the Product Rule of Exponents
the Property of Negative Exponents and the Product Rule of Exponents
only the Product Rule of Exponents
only the Product Rule of Exponents
only the Property of Negative Exponents
Answers
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
To generate the expression \( 314 \) from \( 353 - 9 \), we need to analyze the given expressions.
Starting with \( 353 - 9 \):
1. We have \( 353 \), which can be rewritten as \( 35^{3} \).
2. The expression \( 353 - 9 \) suggests we're subtracting \( 9 \) from \( 53 \), which is not directly related to the manipulation of exponents.
3. To match the target of \( 314 \), we can rewrite \( 35^{3} \) in a way that uses negative exponents.
Using the property of negative exponents:
\[
a^{-n} = \frac{1}{a^{n}}
\]
We could also look at the Product Rule of Exponents:
\[
a^{m} \cdot a^{n} = a^{m+n}
\]
However, neither of these directly aligns with the given transformation without additional context.
Upon closer examination, it appears that \( 353 - 9 \) simplifies to \( 35^{3} \times 10^{-9} \), which is where both the Property of Negative Exponents (for the subtraction of the exponent) and the Product Rule (if we consider different exponent bases) come into play.
In conclusion, the best choice that reflects the transformations involved here is:
**the Property of Negative Exponents and the Product Rule of Exponents.**
Starting with \( 353 - 9 \):
1. We have \( 353 \), which can be rewritten as \( 35^{3} \).
2. The expression \( 353 - 9 \) suggests we're subtracting \( 9 \) from \( 53 \), which is not directly related to the manipulation of exponents.
3. To match the target of \( 314 \), we can rewrite \( 35^{3} \) in a way that uses negative exponents.
Using the property of negative exponents:
\[
a^{-n} = \frac{1}{a^{n}}
\]
We could also look at the Product Rule of Exponents:
\[
a^{m} \cdot a^{n} = a^{m+n}
\]
However, neither of these directly aligns with the given transformation without additional context.
Upon closer examination, it appears that \( 353 - 9 \) simplifies to \( 35^{3} \times 10^{-9} \), which is where both the Property of Negative Exponents (for the subtraction of the exponent) and the Product Rule (if we consider different exponent bases) come into play.
In conclusion, the best choice that reflects the transformations involved here is:
**the Property of Negative Exponents and the Product Rule of Exponents.**
There are no human answers yet. A form for humans to post answers is coming very soon!