Which piece of evidence offers the best justification for why Bode’s law is considered a mathematical curiosity, and not accepted as a law?(1 point)ResponsesCeres is an asteroid, not a planet.Ceres is an asteroid, not a planet.Neptune and Pluto were discovered at distances outside the established pattern.Neptune and Pluto were discovered at distances outside the established pattern.The law offers guidelines to predict the location of planets.The law offers guidelines to predict the location of planets.The law describes a pattern, but does not explain why the pattern occurs.

Answer 1

The piece of evidence that offers the best justification for why Bode’s law is considered a mathematical curiosity and not accepted as a law is: The law describes a pattern, but does not explain why the pattern occurs.

This statement highlights that while Bode's law may suggest certain relationships or distances between planetary bodies, it lacks a foundational explanation or physical principle that accounts for why those distances exist, making it more of a mathematical observation than a scientific law.