Which piece of evidence BEST supports the author's claim in the article "Say No to Genetically Engineered Salmon?"(1 point)ResponsesGenetically engineered salmon is a "Frankenfish" and might turn you into a monster!Genetically engineered salmon is a "Frankenfish" and might turn you into a monster!If used carefully, genetic engineering can produce fish that reach the market much faster such as AquAdvantage Salmon states, and use less feed (fish meal.)If used carefully, genetic engineering can produce fish that reach the market much faster such as AquAdvantage Salmon states, and use less feed (fish meal.)Allowing the AquAdvantage Salmon into our streams and rivers will not harm the natural fish population.Allowing the AquAdvantage Salmon into our streams and rivers will not harm the natural fish population.Genetically altered salmon is bad for human health, as it contains more chemicals than wild salmon, and it is bad for the environment, as the genetically altered fish are raised in overcrowded, netted ocean pens.

Answer 1

The piece of evidence that BEST supports the author's claim in the article "Say No to Genetically Engineered Salmon" is:

"Genetically altered salmon is bad for human health, as it contains more chemicals than wild salmon, and it is bad for the environment, as the genetically altered fish are raised in overcrowded, netted ocean pens."

This statement directly addresses concerns regarding both human health and environmental impact, which are likely central to the author's argument against genetically engineered salmon.