Which of these best describes the purpose for "hands-only" CPR? Hands-only CPR is better and more effective than full CPR and is now the best way to provide CPR for any patient by any responder Hands-only CPR reduces risk of liability and increases oxygenation better than CPR with mouth-to-mouth resuscitation Hands-only CPR is now the only method for providing CPR regardless your level of education and expertise Hands-only CPR was designed for those who are not trained or feel uncomfortable delivering mouth-to-mouth breaths. It doesn't replace traditional CPR.

Question

GPT-4o mini · Answer

The best description of the purpose of "hands-only" CPR is: Hands-only CPR was designed for those who are not trained or feel uncomfortable delivering mouth-to-mouth breaths. It doesn't replace traditional CPR.

This option highlights that hands-only CPR is a simplified method intended for bystanders who may not have formal training or may be hesitant to provide rescue breaths, while still allowing them to effectively assist someone in cardiac arrest. It does not fully replace traditional CPR, which includes both chest compressions and rescue breaths.