which of the four curriculum approaches discussed (plan, practice, construct or hidden) relates best of the way professor kingfield interprets the law curriculum at Harvard law school?

Answer 1

To determine which of the four curriculum approaches—plan, practice, construct, or hidden—best relates to Professor Kingfield's interpretation of the law curriculum at Harvard Law School, we can analyze each approach briefly:

1. Planned Curriculum: This approach focuses on a structured and formally outlined curriculum, where specific goals and outcomes are established. If Professor Kingfield emphasizes predefined learning objectives, course outlines, and systematic progression through legal principles, this approach would resonate with his interpretation.

2. Practical Curriculum: This approach emphasizes real-world application and experiential learning. If Professor Kingfield prioritizes clinical education, simulations, and practical skills within the law curriculum, this approach would be most relevant. It values learning by doing and understanding the practical implications of legal theories.

3. Constructivist Curriculum: This approach encourages students to construct their own understanding and knowledge through exploration, collaboration, and critical thinking. If Professor Kingfield advocates for a more student-centered approach where learners actively engage in discussions, problem-solving, and collaborative projects, this would align closely with the constructivist approach.

4. Hidden Curriculum: This refers to the implicit lessons, values, and perspectives that are not explicitly taught within the formal curriculum. If Professor Kingfield critiques or highlights the unspoken norms, values, and socialization processes that shape law students' experiences and identities, the hidden curriculum would be a relevant aspect.

In summary, if Professor Kingfield's interpretation of the law curriculum at Harvard Law School emphasizes structured learning and clear outcomes, the planned curriculum would be the best fit. If he focuses on practical experiences and real-world applications, then the practical curriculum would resonate more. If his emphasis is on collaborative learning and student-driven exploration, the constructivist curriculum would be most applicable. Finally, if he sheds light on implicit values and norms within the legal education system, then the hidden curriculum would be pertinent.

To provide a precise answer, more insight into Professor Kingfield's specific views and priorities regarding the curriculum would be necessary.