Which of the following would be an example of explanatory writing that lacks cohesion?

Answer 1

Explanatory writing that lacks cohesion typically includes sentences or sections that are disjointed, lack logical flow, or do not clearly connect ideas. Here are a few examples that illustrate this concept:

1. Sudden Topic Changes Without Transitions:

   • "Renewable energy sources are crucial for sustainable development. The cat sat on the windowsill. Solar panels can reduce electricity costs."

2. Inconsistent Tenses or Perspectives:

   • "The Earth revolves around the sun. Yesterday, I went to the store. Scientists study climate change."

3. Vague References and Lack of Clarity:

   • "They found out the answer was wrong. This can impact many people. It is important to address these issues."

4. Random Lists Without Connections:

   • "There are many ways to conserve energy: turning off lights, walking to work, and the quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog."

An explanatory piece would typically need to have clear transitions, consistent focus, and logical progression to avoid such issues. If you provide specific options, I can help identify which fits the description of lacking cohesion.