The correct table that accurately distinguishes the short-term causes and long-term causes of Russification policies is:
Short-Term Causes Long-Term Causes
Develop a centralized Russian identity Gain state control
The assassination of Alexander II Russia's conflict with different territories
The loss in the Crimean War
Gain a political and economic advantage
Which of the following tables accurately distinguishes the short-term causes and long-term causes of Russification policies?(1 point) Responses Short-Term Causes Long-Term Causes Develop a centralized Russian identity Gain state control The assassination of Alexander II Russia’s conflict with different territories The loss in the Crimean War Gain a political and economic advantage Short-Term Causes Long-Term Causes Develop a centralized Russian identity Gain state control The assassination of Alexander II Russia’s conflict with different territories The loss in the Crimean War Gain a political and economic advantage Short-Term Causes Long-Term Causes Russia’s conflict with different territories The loss in the Crimean War The assassination of Alexander II Develop a centralized Russian identity Gain state control Gain a political and economic advantage Short-Term Causes Long-Term Causes Russia’s conflict with different territories The loss in the Crimean War The assassination of Alexander II Develop a centralized Russian identity Gain state control Gain a political and economic advantage Short-Term Causes Long-Term Causes Gain a political and economic advantage Gain state control Develop a centralized Russian identity Russia’s conflict with different territories The loss in the Crimean War The assassination of Alexander II Short-Term Causes Long-Term Causes Gain a political and economic advantage Gain state control Develop a centralized Russian identity Russia’s conflict with different territories The loss in the Crimean War The assassination of Alexander II Short-Term Causes Long-Term Causes Russia’s conflict with different territories The loss in the Crimean War Gain a political and economic advantage Develop a centralized Russian identity The assassination of Alexander II Gain state control
9 answers
Which statement best summarizes the U.S. foreign policy goals from the perspective of peacemaking?(1 point) Responses U.S. foreign policy in the Caribbean intended to retreat military forces to establish peace in the U.S. U.S. foreign policy in the Caribbean intended to retreat military forces to establish peace in the U.S. The U.S. foreign policy in the Caribbean intended to provide stability and peace in an unstable region. The U.S. foreign policy in the Caribbean intended to provide stability and peace in an unstable region. U.S. foreign policy in the Caribbean intended to overthrow threats to U.S. citizens living in Latin America. U.S. foreign policy in the Caribbean intended to overthrow threats to U.S. citizens living in Latin America. The U.S. foreign policy in the Caribbean intended to establish the U.S. as an imperial government in Latin American.
The statement that best summarizes the U.S. foreign policy goals from the perspective of peacemaking is:
The U.S. foreign policy in the Caribbean intended to provide stability and peace in an unstable region.
The U.S. foreign policy in the Caribbean intended to provide stability and peace in an unstable region.
Which of the following charts best compares the goals of “big stick” diplomacy and dollar diplomacy?(1 point) Responses “Big Stick” Diplomacy Dollar Diplomacy End conflict with military Establish financial stability Reduced use of military intervention Expand U.S. economic interests End conflict by paying off aggressors Establish U.S. military power Reinforce U.S. control over Latin America “Big Stick” Diplomacy Dollar Diplomacy End conflict with military Establish financial stability Reduced use of military intervention Expand U.S. economic interests End conflict by paying off aggressors Establish U.S. military power Reinforce U.S. control over Latin America “Big Stick” Diplomacy Dollar Diplomacy End conflict non-peacefully Expand U.S. economic interests Reduced use of military intervention Establish financial stability End conflict with military Establish U.S. military power Reinforce US control over Latin America “Big Stick” Diplomacy Dollar Diplomacy End conflict non-peacefully Expand U.S. economic interests Reduced use of military intervention Establish financial stability End conflict with military Establish U.S. military power Reinforce US control over Latin America “Big Stick” Diplomacy Dollar Diplomacy End conflict with military intervention/force Establish financial stability Reinforce U.S. control over Latin America End conflict peacefully Reduced use of military intervention Establish U.S. military power Expand U.S. economic interests “Big Stick” Diplomacy Dollar Diplomacy End conflict with military intervention/force Establish financial stability Reinforce U.S. control over Latin America End conflict peacefully Reduced use of military intervention Establish U.S. military power Expand U.S. economic interests “Big Stick” Diplomacy Dollar Diplomacy End conflict peacefully Establish U.S. military power Reinforce U.S. control over Latin America End conflict peacefully Reduce use of military intervention Establish financial stability Expand U.S. economic interests
The correct chart that best compares the goals of "big stick" diplomacy and dollar diplomacy is:
"Big Stick" Diplomacy Dollar Diplomacy
End conflict with military intervention/force Establish financial stability
Reinforce U.S. control over Latin America End conflict peacefully
Reduce use of military intervention
Establish U.S. military power
Expand U.S. economic interests
"Big Stick" Diplomacy Dollar Diplomacy
End conflict with military intervention/force Establish financial stability
Reinforce U.S. control over Latin America End conflict peacefully
Reduce use of military intervention
Establish U.S. military power
Expand U.S. economic interests
Which of the following constructs an argument in favor of U.S. annexation of the Philippines?(1 point) Responses Trade reasons: Trade with Germany would increase dramatically. Trade reasons: Trade with Germany would increase dramatically. Economic reasons: Overseas possession are expensive and hard to manage. Economic reasons: Overseas possession are expensive and hard to manage. Paternalism: Filipinos are unfit to rule, and the U.S. has a duty to manage them. Paternalism: Filipinos are unfit to rule, and the U.S. has a duty to manage them. Racist ideology: White Americans’ way of life would be taken away.
The construct that argues in favor of U.S. annexation of the Philippines is:
Paternalism: Filipinos are unfit to rule, and the U.S. has a duty to manage them.
Paternalism: Filipinos are unfit to rule, and the U.S. has a duty to manage them.
Which of the following would most likely construct an argument against U.S. annexation of the Philippines?(1 point) Responses William McKinley William McKinley an imperialist an imperialist National Association of Manufacturers National Association of Manufacturers Sixto López
The most likely option to construct an argument against U.S. annexation of the Philippines is: Sixto López