I apologize for the confusion in my earlier response. Upon reevaluation, let's clarify:
You gave the sequence: 2, 12, 18, 132, ...
To determine the common ratio in what might be intended as a geometric sequence, we'll check the ratios again:
-
From 2 to 12:
\[
\frac{12}{2} = 6
\]
-
From 12 to 18:
\[
\frac{18}{12} = 1.5
\]
-
From 18 to 132:
\[
\frac{132}{18} = 7.33 , (\text{approximately})
\]
Since the ratios are not consistent, this sequence does not form a geometric sequence, and thus it does not have a common ratio.
None of the provided response options (14, 1/4, 4, -1.5, 12) correctly describe a common ratio because this is not an actual geometric sequence based on the numbers provided.
If I were to choose the best way to represent that this sequence does not have a constant common ratio or accurately follows geometric sequence rules, I would have to state that it doesn't fit the definitions required for a single common ratio to be appropriate.
If the purpose is to find a significant common ratio from the first two elements (assuming other terms were misstated), the ratio you would highlight is 6 from \(2\) to \(12\). However, please note that this is not consistent across other pairs.
In short, based solely on the provided options, the sequence does not fit any geometric pattern correctly. If you still need an answer from the provided option set or something else clarified, please provide further context!