Which of the following statements best explains why the addition of the Bill of Rights to the Constitution might be dangerous?(1 point)

Responses

The Bill of Rights would limit the power of state governments.
The Bill of Rights would limit the power of state governments.

The Bill of Rights would limit the power of the national government.
The Bill of Rights would limit the power of the national government.

The Bill of Rights could be interpreted to transfer power to the states.
The Bill of Rights could be interpreted to transfer power to the states.

The Bill of Rights could be interpreted to limit people to the listed rights.

1 answer

The statement that best explains why the addition of the Bill of Rights to the Constitution might be dangerous is:

The Bill of Rights could be interpreted to limit people to the listed rights.

This concern is based on the idea that by enumerating specific rights, it might imply that rights not listed are not protected, potentially undermining individual liberties that are not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution.