Which of the following statements best compares the effects of absolute monarchy and constitutional monarchy?(1 point)

Question

Responses

An absolute monarchy always leads to revolution, while a constitutional monarchy prevents revolution.
An absolute monarchy always leads to revolution, while a constitutional monarchy prevents revolution.

An absolute monarchy is overly dependent on a single monarch, which can lead to a system that is overthrown, while a constitutional monarchy can bring long-term stability.
An absolute monarchy is overly dependent on a single monarch, which can lead to a system that is overthrown, while a constitutional monarchy can bring long-term stability.

An absolute monarchy creates a system that cannot be controlled by other nobles, while a constitutional monarchy creates a system that subordinates the monarch to the elites.
An absolute monarchy creates a system that cannot be controlled by other nobles, while a constitutional monarchy creates a system that subordinates the monarch to the elites.

An absolute monarchy can last for centuries, while a constitutional monarchy only lasts for a set period of time, as outlined in the constitution.

Answer 1

The statement that best compares the effects of absolute monarchy and constitutional monarchy is:

"An absolute monarchy is overly dependent on a single monarch, which can lead to a system that is overthrown, while a constitutional monarchy can bring long-term stability."

This statement highlights the inherent risks of absolute monarchy, where the concentration of power in a single ruler can result in instability, whereas constitutional monarchies, with their systems of checks and balances, are more likely to achieve stability over time.