Which of the following statements best compares the causes of absolute monarchy and constitutional monarchy

Question

Absolute monarchy and constitutional monarchy both usually emerge from chaos, but constitutional monarchy depends on the wishes of those other than the monarch, while absolute monarchy has to do with only the wishes of the monarch
Absolute monarchy and constitutional monarchy both come about when a single monarch attempts to assert their will on the populace, which succeeds in an absolute monarchy but fails in a constitutional monarchy
Absolute monarchy and constitutional monarchy both emerge based on belief in the divine right of kings, but that right is universally embraced in an absolute monarchy and rejected in a constitutional monarchy
Absolute monarchy and constitutional monarchy both come about due to a legal flaw in the pre-existing system, which is exploited by those who form constitutional monarchies but not by those who form absolute monarchies

Answer 1

The statement that best compares the causes of absolute monarchy and constitutional monarchy is:

Absolute monarchy and constitutional monarchy both emerge based on belief in the divine right of kings, but that right is universally embraced in an absolute monarchy and rejected in a constitutional monarchy.

This statement highlights the differing foundations of legitimacy and acceptance of monarchical power between the two forms of monarchy. In absolute monarchies, the monarch's authority is often justified by the divine right to rule, whereas in constitutional monarchies, such divine rights are typically constrained by constitutions or laws that recognize the role of other governing bodies or the populace.