To accurately describe a scientific law, the following statements are applicable:
-
It is an observation that has been made many times - This reflects the nature of a scientific law as it is typically based on repeated experimental observations.
-
There is no contradictory evidence in the current body of knowledge - A scientific law is generally accepted because it has consistently held true under a variety of conditions and is supported by extensive evidence.
-
Can be updated or rejected if any contradictory evidence is found - This is true in a broader scientific context, as scientific knowledge is always subject to revision based on new evidence or discoveries, although in practice, a well-established scientific law is expected to hold true unless significant new evidence is presented.
The other options do not accurately describe a scientific law:
- It is an educated guess about how a process occurs - This describes a hypothesis rather than a scientific law.
- It is a statement that is true in many, but not all, cases - This is more characteristic of scientific theories or hypotheses, as scientific laws typically describe consistent and universal relationships in nature.
In summary, the statements that best describe a scientific law are the first, second, and fifth options.
7 answers