Which of the following pieces of evidence would best support the argument that humans are more evolutionarily related to fish than they are to insects?(1 point)

Question

Responses

All these organisms require oxygen to survive.
All these organisms require oxygen to survive.

Fossils of ancient fish and human ancestors have been discovered in the same sedimentary rock layers.
Fossils of ancient fish and human ancestors have been discovered in the same sedimentary rock layers.

The earliest fish fossils are found in the lowest strata of sedimentary rocks, followed by insects, and then humans.
The earliest fish fossils are found in the lowest strata of sedimentary rocks, followed by insects, and then humans.

The early stages of embryo development in fish and humans look strikingly similar while insects develop very differently compared to both fish and humans.

Answer 1

The piece of evidence that would best support the argument that humans are more evolutionarily related to fish than they are to insects is:

The early stages of embryo development in fish and humans look strikingly similar while insects develop very differently compared to both fish and humans.

This evidence highlights the comparative embryonic development, which suggests a closer evolutionary relationship between fish and humans than between humans and insects. It indicates that fish and humans share more common developmental pathways, supporting the argument of closer evolutionary ties.