Which of the following offers the best comparison between Hobbes’s and Locke’s perspectives on the divine right of kings?(1 point) Responses Both saw the divine right of kings as unnatural and bad. Both saw the divine right of kings as unnatural and bad. Hobbes supported the divine right of kings as absolute monarchs. Hobbes supported the divine right of kings as absolute monarchs. Locke supported the divine right of kings because it gave people more freedom. Locke supported the divine right of kings because it gave people more freedom. As Christians, both accepted the divine right of kings.

Answer 1

The most accurate comparison between Hobbes's and Locke's perspectives on the divine right of kings is:

Hobbes supported the divine right of kings as absolute monarchs.

Hobbes believed in a strong, centralized authority to prevent chaos and conflict, which he justified through the idea of the social contract leading to an absolute sovereign, often seen as having a divine right. In contrast, Locke was critical of the divine right of kings and advocated for a government that was accountable to the people and based on their consent. Therefore, Hobbes's support for the divine right contrasts sharply with Locke's views against it.