Which of the following offers the best comparison between Hobbes’s and Locke’s perspectives on the divine right of kings?(1 point)

Question

Responses

Both saw the divine right of kings as unnatural and bad.
Both saw the divine right of kings as unnatural and bad.

As Christians, both accepted the divine right of kings.
As Christians, both accepted the divine right of kings.

Locke supported the divine right of kings because it gave people more freedom.
Locke supported the divine right of kings because it gave people more freedom.

Hobbes supported the divine right of kings as absolute monarchs.

Answer 1

The best comparison between Hobbes’s and Locke’s perspectives on the divine right of kings from the options you provided is:

Hobbes supported the divine right of kings as absolute monarchs.

This is accurate because Hobbes believed in a strong, centralized authority (an absolute monarchy) to maintain order and prevent chaos, which aligns with the idea of divine right. On the other hand, Locke criticized the notion of divine right and advocated for government based on consent and individual rights.