Which of the following offers the best comparison between Hobbes's and Locke's perspectives on the

divine right of kings? (1 point)
Both saw the divine right of kings as unnatural and bad.
As Christians, both accepted the divine right of kings.
O Hobbes supported the divine right of kings as absolute monarchs.
O Locke supported the divine right of kings because it gave people more freedom.

1 answer

The best comparison between Hobbes's and Locke's perspectives on the divine right of kings is:

Hobbes supported the divine right of kings as absolute monarchs.

Hobbes believed that a strong, centralized authority (often manifesting as an absolute monarchy) was necessary to maintain order and prevent the chaos of a natural state. In contrast, Locke was more skeptical of absolute power and advocated for governmental authority derived from the consent of the governed, thus opposing the divine right of kings.