It seems like there might be a typo in your question. If you're asking about what an "unlimited government" might be more likely to do compared to a "limited government," here are some points of comparison:
-
Decision-Making: An unlimited government can make decisions more swiftly and implement policies rapidly, as there may be fewer checks and balances.
-
Control over Society: Unlimited governments tend to exert greater control over various aspects of society, including the economy, media, and personal freedoms.
-
Suppression of Dissent: They may be more likely to suppress dissent and limit freedom of speech, as they prioritize maintaining power.
-
Centralized Power: Unlimited governments centralize power in the hands of a few leaders or a single authority, which can lead to more uniform policy enforcement.
-
Lack of Accountability: There may be less accountability to citizens, leading to potential abuses of power and corruption, as institutions responsible for oversight may be weakened or nonexistent.
These contrasts generally illustrate the tendencies of unlimited governments compared to limited governments, which typically have checks and balances to prevent the concentration of power. If you meant to ask something else or need specific examples, please clarify!