Which of the following is true of the Nootka Sound Controversy’s resolution? Select all that apply.

Question

(1 point)
Responses

The British were free to trade anywhere above the 42nd parallel.
The British were free to trade anywhere above the 42nd parallel.

The British were free to fish anywhere above the 42nd parallel.
The British were free to fish anywhere above the 42nd parallel.

The Spanish were free to settle anywhere below the 42nd parallel.
The Spanish were free to settle anywhere below the 42nd parallel.

The Spanish could claim any location they were able to build a settlement on.
The Spanish could claim any location they were able to build a settlement on.

The Spanish agreed not to trade fur at any trading post in Oregon Territory.

Answer 1

The Nootka Sound Controversy, which occurred in the late 18th century, primarily involved disputes between Great Britain and Spain over territorial claims on the Pacific Northwest coast of North America, specifically surrounding Nootka Sound on Vancouver Island. The resolution of this controversy was formalized in the Nootka Convention of 1790 and subsequent agreements.

Based on historical context, the following statements are true regarding the resolution of the Nootka Sound Controversy:

1. The British were free to trade anywhere above the 42nd parallel. - This is true.
2. The British were free to fish anywhere above the 42nd parallel. - This is also true, although fishing rights were less explicitly stated in the treaties but generally allowed.
3. The Spanish were free to settle anywhere below the 42nd parallel. - This is correct, as the Spanish were granted certain rights to establish settlements in their claimed territories.
4. The Spanish could claim any location they were able to build a settlement on. - This is generally true; however, it is subject to specific terms outlined in the agreements.
5. The Spanish agreed not to trade fur at any trading post in Oregon Territory. - This is not explicitly accurate; while there were restrictions, the agreement primarily involved regulated trade and territorial rights rather than an outright ban on all fur trading.

From this analysis, the validated responses would be the first four options regarding British and Spanish rights above and below the 42nd parallel. The last statement concerning Spanish fur trading is not necessarily correct.

Answer 2

what's the answer

Answer 3

Based on the context of the Nootka Sound Controversy’s resolution, the true statements are:

1. The British were free to trade anywhere above the 42nd parallel.
2. The British were free to fish anywhere above the 42nd parallel.
3. The Spanish were free to settle anywhere below the 42nd parallel.
4. The Spanish could claim any location they were able to build a settlement on.

Therefore, please select the first four options as correct. The last statement regarding the Spanish agreeing not to trade fur at any trading post in Oregon Territory is not true.

Answer 4

is it 2 and 4 the awnser

Answer 5

I apologize for any confusion. Let’s clarify the statements regarding the Nootka Sound Controversy:

1. The British were free to trade anywhere above the 42nd parallel. (True)
2. The British were free to fish anywhere above the 42nd parallel. (True)
3. The Spanish were free to settle anywhere below the 42nd parallel. (True)
4. The Spanish could claim any location they were able to build a settlement on. (Generally True, but less clear in terms of explicit language)
5. The Spanish agreed not to trade fur at any trading post in Oregon Territory. (Not true)

So, the correct responses are actually 1, 2, 3, and 4. If your intention was specifically to identify options 2 and 4, those are correct as well, but they are not the only correct selections. The first three statements are also true regarding the resolution of the controversy.

To summarize: 1, 2, 3, and 4 are correct.