Ask a New Question
Menu

Which of the following is true of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict?(1 point) Responses

The Oslo Accords created permanent peace between the Israelis and the Palestinians.
The Oslo Accords created permanent peace between the Israelis and the Palestinians.

Iran has been a partner for peace in solving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Iran has been a partner for peace in solving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Issues such as the status of Jerusalem have made a long-lasting peace difficult to achieve.
Issues such as the status of Jerusalem have made a long-lasting peace difficult to achieve.

The Camp David accords achieved peace between Israel and Hamas.

11 answers

The statement that is true about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is:

Issues such as the status of Jerusalem have made a long-lasting peace difficult to achieve.

The other statements are incorrect. The Oslo Accords did not create permanent peace, Iran has not been a partner for peace in this conflict, and the Camp David Accords were primarily between Israel and Egypt, not Israel and Hamas.

What was one of Anton Wilhelm Amo’s most influential ideas?(1 point)
Responses

The world’s knowledge can be organized logically and made accessible to everyone.
The world’s knowledge can be organized logically and made accessible to everyone.

Women must be educated to the same degree as men.
Women must be educated to the same degree as men.

The human mind does not sense material or physical things. Instead, it can only sense spiritual things, such as itself.
The human mind does not sense material or physical things. Instead, it can only sense spiritual things, such as itself.

People give up freedoms to governmental institutions in exchange for peace and security.

One of Anton Wilhelm Amo’s most influential ideas is:

The human mind does not sense material or physical things. Instead, it can only sense spiritual things, such as itself.

Amo was known for his contributions to philosophy, particularly concerning the nature of the mind and cognition. The other statements, while significant in various philosophical contexts, are not specifically attributed to Amo.

By the end of the twentieth century, what impact had the one-child policy had in China?(1 point) Responses

The birth rate was declining and people were living shorter lives, reducing the population.
The birth rate was declining and people were living shorter lives, reducing the population.

The policy did not lead to any particular improvements in the nation and was criticized by many.
The policy did not lead to any particular improvements in the nation and was criticized by many.

Most Chinese people tried to fight the policy to protect the tradition of having larger families.
Most Chinese people tried to fight the policy to protect the tradition of having larger families.

The nation saw many improvements, including economic growth and lower poverty levels in rural areas.

The most accurate statement regarding the impact of the one-child policy in China by the end of the twentieth century is:

The policy did not lead to any particular improvements in the nation and was criticized by many.

While the one-child policy did contribute to a significant decline in birth rates, it faced substantial criticism for its social and ethical implications, including issues related to gender imbalance, aging population, and human rights abuses.

Analyze the positive and negative effects international economic partnerships and financial institutions have had in the world.(1 point) Responses

Positive effects include the continuation of NAFTA; negative effects include resource extraction from countries with growing economies.
Positive effects include the continuation of NAFTA; negative effects include resource extraction from countries with growing economies.

Positive effects include global economic growth; negative effects include the concentration of resources and power.
Positive effects include global economic growth; negative effects include the concentration of resources and power.

Positive effects include the end of proxy conflicts; negative effects include the end of the World Bank.
Positive effects include the end of proxy conflicts; negative effects include the end of the World Bank.

Positive effects include an increasingly globalized world; negative effects include the equitable distribution of power.

The statement that best encapsulates the positive and negative effects of international economic partnerships and financial institutions is:

Positive effects include global economic growth; negative effects include the concentration of resources and power.

This response recognizes that international economic partnerships and institutions like the World Bank and IMF can drive economic growth and development, but they can also lead to inequalities and the concentration of economic power, often favoring wealthier nations or entities at the expense of developing countries. The other options either inaccurately describe outcomes (e.g., the end of the World Bank) or don't capture the complexities of these partnerships effectively.

How did NAFTA contribute to globalization?(which is correct)
The economies of the countries involved became more enmeshed.

It increased most trade tariffs between the countries involved.

NAFTA was replaced by the United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement (USMCA) in 2020.

It reflected a broader debate about trade policy regarding how to integrate the economies of poor and wealthy countries.

The correct statement about how NAFTA contributed to globalization is:

The economies of the countries involved became more enmeshed.

NAFTA, implemented in 1994, facilitated trade and investment between the United States, Canada, and Mexico by reducing tariffs and promoting cross-border trade, which effectively integrated the economies of these countries. The other statements are either incorrect or not directly related to the core contribution of NAFTA to globalization. For example, NAFTA actually decreased tariffs, and while it was later replaced by the USMCA, that point does not directly address its role in globalization.

What are resources? What is the effect if they are not distributed equitably?(1 point) Responses
Resources are things that people make from things found in nature; if they are not distributed equitably, then things found in nature are used as much as they should be.
Resources are things that people make from things found in nature; if they are not distributed equitably, then things found in nature are used as much as they should be.

Resources are anything that humans need in order to survive, live, and thrive; if they are not distributed equitably, people’s lives can become more difficult.
Resources are anything that humans need in order to survive, live, and thrive; if they are not distributed equitably, people’s lives can become more difficult.

Resources are the people who possess the knowledge to make things; if they are not distributed equitably, then technology steps in instead.
Resources are the people who possess the knowledge to make things; if they are not distributed equitably, then technology steps in instead.

Resources are things that are found in nature; if they are not distributed equitably, then people turn to human-made things instead.

The correct statement regarding resources and the effect of their inequitable distribution is:

Resources are anything that humans need in order to survive, live, and thrive; if they are not distributed equitably, people’s lives can become more difficult.

This definition encompasses a broad range of resources, including natural resources, economic resources, and social resources, and accurately reflects the consequences of their unequal distribution, which can lead to increased inequality, social unrest, and difficulties in quality of life for those disadvantaged. The other options present definitions of resources that are either too narrow or incorrect.