Here are the statements about electronic surveillance that are generally considered true:
-
Police must obtain a warrant to monitor telephone calls. - True. In most circumstances, law enforcement agencies are required to obtain a warrant based on probable cause to conduct wiretaps or monitor calls.
-
Police may place surveillance devices on suspected criminals’ phones. - This can be true, but it typically also requires a warrant or judicial authorization, depending on jurisdiction and specific circumstances.
-
Police can plant viruses on smartphones of suspected drug runners. - This is a controversial area, and while there have been instances where law enforcement has used such methods, they usually require legal justifications and possibly a warrant, depending on jurisdiction.
-
Private citizens can monitor other people’s telephone calls. - Generally false. It is illegal for private citizens to intercept or monitor phone calls without the consent of at least one party involved in the conversation.
-
Private citizens can record their own telephone calls in most states. - True. In many states, individuals can legally record their own phone conversations as long as they are a participant in the call. However, laws vary by state, and in some states, all parties must consent to the recording.
So, generally, the true statements would be:
- Police must obtain a warrant to monitor telephone calls.
- Private citizens can record their own telephone calls in most states.