Which of the following is best supported by evidence as you analyze the impact of the Cold War on racial tensions within the U.S.?(1 point)

Question

Responses

Over time, U.S. policy makers became aware that the U.S. needed to address issues such as racial segregation and discrimination as part of its larger Cold War strategy.
Over time, U.S. policy makers became aware that the U.S. needed to address issues such as racial segregation and discrimination as part of its larger Cold War strategy.

U.S. leaders were hesitant to openly support civil rights initiatives for fear of being labeled as “soft” on communism.
U.S. leaders were hesitant to openly support civil rights initiatives for fear of being labeled as “soft” on communism.

U.S. leaders focused on the Cold War and national security concerns to such an extent that they paid relatively little attention to the civil rights movement.
U.S. leaders focused on the Cold War and national security concerns to such an extent that they paid relatively little attention to the civil rights movement.

Most civil rights leaders focused on race as a domestic issue and paid little attention to the international impact of racial discrimination.

Answer 1

The statement that is best supported by evidence regarding the impact of the Cold War on racial tensions within the U.S. is:

Over time, U.S. policy makers became aware that the U.S. needed to address issues such as racial segregation and discrimination as part of its larger Cold War strategy.

This conclusion is supported by historical evidence showing that U.S. leaders recognized that racial discrimination and segregation undermined the nation's credibility in its fight against communism, particularly in the context of competing ideologies during the Cold War. They feared that racial injustices could be exploited by communist countries in their propaganda against the United States and could also harm U.S. diplomatic relations abroad. Consequently, civil rights reform became increasingly linked to broader Cold War objectives, prompting some policymakers to take action in support of civil rights initiatives.