Which of the following is an accurate evaluation of the impact of money generated by citizen activism?(1 point)

Responses

Money generated by citizen activism can be very effective in changing how members of Congress vote.
Money generated by citizen activism can be very effective in changing how members of Congress vote.

Money generated by citizen activism can be very effective in controlling the news cycle.
Money generated by citizen activism can be very effective in controlling the news cycle.

Money generated by citizen activism can be very effective in deciding which demonstrations receive coverage.
Money generated by citizen activism can be very effective in deciding which demonstrations receive coverage.

Money generated by citizen activism can be very effective in changing electoral outcomes.
Money generated by citizen activism can be very effective in changing electoral outcomes.
Skip to navigation
page 34 of 34

1 answer

The most accurate evaluation of the impact of money generated by citizen activism would be:

Money generated by citizen activism can be very effective in changing electoral outcomes.

This statement acknowledges the significant role that financial contributions from citizen-led movements can play in influencing elections, supporting candidates who align with their causes, and mobilizing resources for campaigns. While the other statements may have merit, the direct linkage to changing electoral outcomes is often a clear and measurable impact of such financial resources.