Which of the following is an accurate critique of presidential systems of government?(1 point) Responses In presidential systems of government, there is no way for the court system to stop an action of the president. In presidential systems of government, there is no way for the court system to stop an action of the president. Presidential systems of government are more likely to lead to divided government. Presidential systems of government are more likely to lead to divided government. Presidential systems of government are more likely to result in a high concentration of power in a single branch. Presidential systems of government are more likely to result in a high concentration of power in a single branch. Presidential systems of government are undemocratic because the legislature selects the head of the executive branch.

Answer 1

The most accurate critique of presidential systems of government among the options provided is: "Presidential systems of government are more likely to lead to divided government."

This critique highlights the possibility for a separation of powers that can create a scenario where different branches of government are controlled by different political parties, which can lead to gridlock and difficulty in governing effectively.

The other statements are either inaccurate or misleading. For example:

• In presidential systems, there are usually mechanisms (such as judicial review) that allow the court system to check presidential actions, though the extent of this varies across different countries.
• The claim of a high concentration of power in a single branch might be more characteristic of authoritarian regimes rather than democratic presidential systems, where checks and balances are intended to distribute power.
• The assertion that presidential systems are undemocratic because the legislature selects the head of the executive branch is typically more associated with parliamentary systems rather than presidential systems, where the president is usually elected directly by the voters.

Therefore, the critique about the likelihood of divided government is the most nuanced and applicable critique in the context of presidential systems.