The second response is a well-crafted personal response to the prompt. It clearly presents an opinion about which characters hold power, offering a rationale for that choice by contrasting the young people's drive with the resigned attitude of the residents. It provides specific examples from the story to support its reasoning, which makes it more persuasive and relevant to the prompt.
In contrast, the first response is too brief and lacks explanation or depth, while the third response focuses on the setting rather than directly addressing the character's power, making it less aligned with the requirements of the prompt.