To accurately determine the truth of statements A and B, we need to examine them in the context of the network's topology, which is not provided in your message. However, I can help you analyze the statements in a general context:
-
Statement A: "The network is fault tolerant. If one connection fails, any two devices can still communicate."
- If the network is designed with redundant connections or pathways between devices (like in a mesh network), then this statement is likely true. In such cases, even if one connection fails, alternative paths still allow communication between devices.
-
Statement B: "Computers C and E need to first communicate with at least one other device in order to communicate with each other."
- This statement would be true if computers C and E are not directly connected and require an intermediary device to relay messages. In a star topology or similar network configurations, this could often be the case.
Without knowing the specific network topology, we can't definitively declare A or B as true or false. However, here’s how you could evaluate them:
- If the network allows all devices to communicate directly with multiple alternate pathways, then A is true.
- If C and E can communicate directly without needing other devices, then B is false, and vice versa.
If you're familiar with the specific network layout, please provide that information so I can give a more accurate assessment. Otherwise, based on common network configurations:
- If the network is fully interconnected or has sufficient redundancy, A would likely be true.
- If C and E do not have a direct connection, B would be true.
So, it's possible that either just A, just B, both A and B, or neither applies based on the network's design. Please specify the network configuration if you need a precise answer.