Question

Which of the following explains how a democracy can affect the rights of its citizens?(1 point) Responses In a democracy, the majority of citizens can limit the rights of the minority. In a democracy, the majority of citizens can limit the rights of the minority. In a democracy, elected representatives are responsible for protecting the rights of citizens. In a democracy, elected representatives are responsible for protecting the rights of citizens. In a democracy, the minority of citizens can take away the rights of the majority. In a democracy, the minority of citizens can take away the rights of the majority. In a democracy, the rights of all citizens are protected.

Answer 1

In a democracy, the most accurate statement regarding how a democracy can affect the rights of its citizens is: "In a democracy, elected representatives are responsible for protecting the rights of citizens."

This emphasizes the role of elected officials in safeguarding the rights of all individuals, which is a core principle of democratic governance. Although it is also true that majoritarian rule can lead to the limitation of minority rights, the ideal of democracy is to protect the rights of all citizens, regardless of their number.

Answer 2

Use the excerpt from the U.S. Constitution to answer the question. “. . . To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes; . . .” What era is this law likely to be associated with? (1 point) Responses Post-World War II Era Post-World War II Era New Deal Era New Deal Era Laissez-Faire Era Laissez-Faire Era Progressive Era

Answer 3

The excerpt from the U.S. Constitution referring to regulating commerce is likely associated with the Laissez-Faire Era. This period, particularly during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, was characterized by limited government intervention in economic matters, but it is also when the foundation for federal regulation of interstate commerce was established, eventually leading to more government involvement in the economy.

However, it's important to note that the excerpt itself is from the Constitution, which was written in the late 18th century. If the context of "regulating commerce" is considered historically, it could be debated in relation to several eras. But, based strictly on the options provided and the general association of commerce regulation with less direct governmental control, the Laissez-Faire Era is the most fitting response here.