Which of the following develops a logical argument about how judicial restraint supports the Supreme Court’s Plessy v. Ferguson decision?(1 point)

Question

Responses

Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the Supreme Court did not challenge the actions of the executive or legislative branches.
Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the Supreme Court did not challenge the actions of the executive or legislative branches.

Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the decision challenged the legislative intent of the equal protections clause.
Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the decision challenged the legislative intent of the equal protections clause.

Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the decision challenged the actions of the legislative and judicial branches.
Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the decision challenged the actions of the legislative and judicial branches.

Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the decision invalidated the separate but equal doctrine.

Answer 1

The correct response that develops a logical argument about how judicial restraint supports the Supreme Court’s Plessy v. Ferguson decision is:

Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the Supreme Court did not challenge the actions of the executive or legislative branches.

This argument correctly notes that judicial restraint involves a reluctance to overturn the decisions made by the legislative and executive branches, which aligns with the Court's decision in Plessy v. Ferguson to uphold the constitutionality of racial segregation laws rather than challenge the intent and actions of the legislature.