Which of the following develops a logical argument about how judicial restraint supports the Supreme Court’s Plessy v. Ferguson decision?(1 point)

Question

Responses

Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the Supreme Court did not challenge the actions of the executive or legislative branches.
Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the Supreme Court did not challenge the actions of the executive or legislative branches.

Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the decision challenged the actions of the legislative and judicial branches.
Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the decision challenged the actions of the legislative and judicial branches.

Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the decision challenged the legislative intent of the equal protections clause.
Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the decision challenged the legislative intent of the equal protections clause.

Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the decision invalidated the separate but equal doctrine.

Answer 1

The response that develops a logical argument about how judicial restraint supports the Supreme Court’s Plessy v. Ferguson decision is:

Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the Supreme Court did not challenge the actions of the executive or legislative branches.

This statement aligns with the concept of judicial restraint, which emphasizes a reluctance by the judiciary to overturn laws or decisions made by the other branches of government, thus supporting the Court's decision in Plessy v. Ferguson.