To analyze the expression \( p + (-q) \), we first rewrite it as \( p - q \). Given that \( p \) and \( q \) are positive numbers, the sum \( p - q \) can be interpreted based on the relationship between \( p \) and \( q \).
-
If \( p > q \), then \( p - q \) will be positive, and will be located \( p \) units to the right of zero and \( q \) units to the left of \( p \). Hence, the result will be \( p - q \) and can be visualized on the number line.
-
If \( p < q \), then \( p - q \) will be negative, and will lie to the left of zero.
-
If \( p = q \), the result will be \( 0 \).
Now let's evaluate the options:
-
A. Says "the sum \( p + (-q) \) is the number located a distance from |q| in a positive direction". This is incorrect; that would imply we are increasing \( |q| \), which is not what happens with \( p - q \).
-
B. Says "the sum \( p + (-q) \) is the number located a distance from |q| in a negative direction". This could be true in the case where \( p < q \), but not necessarily true in all cases.
-
C. Says "the sum \( p + (-q) \) is the number located a distance from |p| in a negative direction". This does not represent the operation of subtracting \( q \) from \( p \).
-
D. Says "the sum \( p + (-q) \) is the number located a distance from |p| in a positive direction". This is incorrect as well for similar reasons to option C.
Given the analysis above, none of the options fully and accurately describes the sum \( p + (-q) \) under all conditions that can arise based on the relationship between \( p \) and \( q \).
However, focusing specifically on the absolute value and direction:
- The sum \( p - q \) is effectively the difference and can be seen as moving \( p \) and adjusting \( q \), indicating directional distance with relation to both terms.
Nonetheless, among them, option B may conceptually align under specific simple scenarios but lacks completeness across general cases.
Overall, no single choice encapsulates the expression fully without ambiguity based on the positivity of \( p \) and \( q \).