An example of bias in historical accounts could be "A historian selectively choosing evidence that supports their viewpoint." This indicates a one-sided interpretation of history that does not consider other perspectives or evidence. The other options, such as presenting multiple perspectives, relying on primary sources, or acknowledging limitations, typically contribute to a more balanced and nuanced understanding of historical events rather than introducing bias.
Which of the following could be an example of bias in historical accounts?(1 point) Responses A historian selectively choosing evidence that supports their viewpoint A historian selectively choosing evidence that supports their viewpoint A historian presenting multiple perspectives on a historical event A historian presenting multiple perspectives on a historical event A historian relying solely on primary sources for their research A historian relying solely on primary sources for their research A historian acknowledging the limitations of their own knowledge
1 answer