To determine which expression is equivalent to \( 30m + (21m - 53) + (18 - 2m) \) according to the Associative Property, we need to see how we can group the terms differently without changing their overall value.
Using the Associative Property, we can regroup the terms. The original expression can be rearranged as follows:
-
Option A: \( 53m - 35 \)
- This is a numerical evaluation rather than a demonstration of the associative property.
-
Option B: \( (49m - 53) + 16 \)
- This combines the \( m \) terms to get \( 49m \) directly and adjusts the constants, but it doesn't demonstrate grouping.
-
Option C: \( (30m + 21m) + (18 - 2m) \)
- This expression correctly uses the Associative Property by grouping the \( m \)-terms together and keeps the other terms separate.
-
Option D: \( 51m + (-53 + 18) - 2m \)
- This expression also rearranges terms, but it does not clearly show the application of the Associative Property.
Since we are looking for the option that employs the Associative Property correctly (by creating groups without changing the overall expression), the correct choice is:
C. \( (30m + 21m) + (18 - 2m) \).
This shows how the terms can be regrouped without changing their values.