Which of the following correctly analyzes the reasoning used by the Supreme Court to provide less protection to obscene material than it did for other forms of expression?(1 point)%0D%0AResponses%0D%0A%0D%0AThe court reasoned that obscene material, unlike forms of political expression, did not provide serious value to society.%0D%0AThe court reasoned that obscene material, unlike forms of political expression, did not provide serious value to society.%0D%0A%0D%0AThe court reasoned that any speech involving the use of obscenity was not protected by the freedom of speech.%0D%0AThe court reasoned that any speech involving the use of obscenity was not protected by the freedom of speech.%0D%0A%0D%0AThe court reasoned that any material offensive to a significant number of people losses its protection under the freedom of expression.%0D%0AThe court reasoned that any material offensive to a significant number of people losses its protection under the freedom of expression.%0D%0A%0D%0AThe court reasoned that any obscene material could be banned because the average person cannot decide what is obscene and what is not obscene.

Answer 1

The correct analysis of the reasoning used by the Supreme Court to provide less protection to obscene material is:

The court reasoned that obscene material, unlike forms of political expression, did not provide serious value to society.

This reflects the understanding that the Supreme Court has often distinguished obscene material from other forms of protected speech based on its perceived lack of social value or importance.