Which of the following compares the role of monumental architecture in the Aztec and Inca capitals? (1 point)

Question

(1 point)
Both monumental structures were built in capital cities as places to worship, the Aztec structure had a landscape design that signified two gods, whereas the Inca structure was rounded and signified one god.
Both monumental structures were built in capital cities as places to worship, the Aztec structure had one temple that signified the sun god, whereas the Inca structure had two temples that signified God.
Both monumental structures were built in capital cities as places to worship the Aztec structure was a pyramid that signified two gods. whereas the Inca structure was rounded and signified one god
Both monumental structures were built in capital cities as places to worship the Aztec structure had two temples that signified the Tawanaku gods. whereas the Inca structure had one temple that signified God

Answer 1

The best comparison from the options provided is:

Both monumental structures were built in capital cities as places to worship; the Aztec structure was a pyramid that signified two gods, whereas the Inca structure was rounded and signified one god.

This statement accurately reflects the monumental architecture of the Aztec capital (Tenochtitlan), which featured the Templo Mayor as a pyramid dedicated to multiple deities, and the Inca capital (Cusco), characterized by structures like the Coricancha, which was rounded and primarily dedicated to the sun god, Inti.