Which of the following best summarizes the logic used by the Anti-Federalists to argue against a single large republic?(1 point) Responses A single large republic will make it difficult if not impossible to represent the views of the citizens. A single large republic will make it difficult if not impossible to represent the views of the citizens. A single large republic will best represent and protect the interests of the states. A single large republic will best represent and protect the interests of the states. A single large republic will make controlling factions easier. A single large republic will make controlling factions easier. A single large republic will make direct citizen participation easier. A single large republic will make direct citizen participation easier.
1 answer
The best summary of the logic used by the Anti-Federalists to argue against a single large republic is: A single large republic will make it difficult if not impossible to represent the views of the citizens.
Anti-Federalists believed that a large republic would be too diverse and geographically expansive to adequately represent the interests and voices of individual citizens, leading to a disconnect between the government and the populace.
18 answers
1 answer
1 answer
1 answer