Responses
Dissatisfied local leaders could object to decisions by the emperor and cause problems.
Dissatisfied local leaders could object to decisions by the emperor and cause problems.
It eliminated the need for a central emperor and expensive religious rituals.
It eliminated the need for a central emperor and expensive religious rituals.
Local leaders retaining power likely made them more content to be part of the empire.
Local leaders retaining power likely made them more content to be part of the empire.
City-states within the empire had to build up armies to protect themselves.
1 answer
The response that best suggests the benefits of the Aztec Empire’s decentralized government is:
"Local leaders retaining power likely made them more content to be part of the empire."
This highlights how a decentralized system can foster loyalty and cooperation among local leaders, contributing to the overall stability and success of the empire.
