Which of the following best explains why the addition of the bill of rights to the constitution must be dangerous? A. Could be interpreted to limit people to the listed rights b. Would limit the power of state government c. Would limit the power of the national

Question

Government d. Could be interpreted to transfer power to the state

Answer 1

The option that best explains why the addition of the Bill of Rights to the Constitution could be seen as dangerous is:

A. Could be interpreted to limit people to the listed rights.

This concern arises from the fear that explicitly listing certain rights could imply that any rights not listed are not protected, potentially restricting individual liberties instead of safeguarding them.