Which of the following best explains the size difference between New England farms and southern farms during colonial times?

Question

In New England, the soil was rich and the growing season was long, so the farms were bigger.
In New England, the soil was poor and the growing season was short, so the farms were smaller.
In New England, the soil was rich and the growing season was short, so the farms were bigger.
In New England, the soil was poor and the growing season was long, so the farms were smaller.

Answer 1

The best explanation for the size difference between New England farms and southern farms during colonial times is:

In New England, the soil was poor and the growing season was short, so the farms were smaller.

New England's rocky soil and harsh climate limited large-scale agricultural production, which contrasted with the southern colonies, where fertile soil and a longer growing season allowed for larger plantations and farms.