which of the following best explains reason justices use precedents in majority opinions and dissents

to review the main points that were origionally presented in the case
to familiarize themselves with cases that had opposite outcomes
to show that other cases with similar circumstances came to a similar decision
to emphasize the importance of the judical process in making a decision

1 answer

The most appropriate explanation for why justices use precedents in majority opinions and dissents is: to show that other cases with similar circumstances came to a similar decision.
Similar Questions
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  1. why do justices use precedents in majority opinions and dissentsto review the main points that were origionally presented in the
    1. answers icon 1 answer
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  2. Why do justices write concurring opinions?Multiple choice question. They initially voted with the majority but changed their
    1. answers icon 3 answers
more similar questions