Which of the following BEST describes the interpretation of the balance of power between the states and the federal government as laid out in the McCulloch v. Maryland decision?

Question

A.
States may not seek to influence federal office holders.

B.
States may not tax instruments of the federal government.

C.
The federal government may not apply regulations in the states.

D. ***?
The federal government may not interfere in exclusively state business.

Answer 1

i think its B :)
Evidence: The court decided that the Federal Government had the right and power to set up a Federal bank and that states did not have the power to tax the Federal Government. Marshall ruled in favor of the Federal Government and concluded, “the power to tax involves the power to destroy."
Basically: McCullough v Maryland gave the government power to establish a national bank and ruled that states did not have the power to tax the Federal Government.