Which of the following best analyzes the impact of European trade on the development of European cities?(1 point)

Responses

There was less trade in European cities because most of it was done between the Western Hemisphere and Asia.

There was less trade in European cities because most of it was done between the Western Hemisphere and Asia.

Global trade made it possible for new ideas to form and spread, and cities helped ideas spread quickly.

Global trade made it possible for new ideas to form and spread, and cities helped ideas spread quickly.

It became harder to trade in cities because rulers created more limitations to prevent foreign goods.

It became harder to trade in cities because rulers created more limitations to prevent foreign goods.

European trade did not really impact the development of European cities because they did not get larger.

European trade did not really impact the development of European cities because they did not get larger.

Skip to navigation

page 23 of 23

1 answer

The response that best analyzes the impact of European trade on the development of European cities is:

Global trade made it possible for new ideas to form and spread, and cities helped ideas spread quickly.

This statement acknowledges the interconnection between trade and the growth of cities, highlighting how trade facilitated the exchange of ideas and cultural influences, which in turn contributed to the development and dynamism of urban areas in Europe.