Which of the following best analyzes how Nevada has protected abortion rights for people inside and outside the state?(1 point)
Responses
Nevada voters cannot revoke abortion rights in the state.
Nevada voters cannot revoke abortion rights in the state.
Nevada did not codify the right to an abortion, which means it is protected within the state.
Nevada did not codify the right to an abortion, which means it is protected within the state.
Nevada is a not a safe haven for people out of state seeking an abortion.
Nevada is a not a safe haven for people out of state seeking an abortion.
Nevada codified the right to an abortion, which means it is protected by law within the state
9 answers
Nevada codified the right to an abortion, which means it is protected by law within the state.
What changes would the Better Voting Nevada bill make for voters?(1 point)
Responses
Voters would be able to vote in closed primaries, rank candidates, and have more than two candidates on a ballot.
Voters would be able to vote in closed primaries, rank candidates, and have more than two candidates on a ballot.
Voters would be able to vote in open primaries, have more than two candidates on the ballot, and have the legislature break a tie when necessary.
Voters would be able to vote in open primaries, have more than two candidates on the ballot, and have the legislature break a tie when necessary.
Voters would be able to rank candidates, vote in open primaries, and have more than two candidates on a ballot.
Voters would be able to rank candidates, vote in open primaries, and have more than two candidates on a ballot.
Voters would be able have two candidates on a ballot, vote in open primaries, and rank candidates.
Voters would be able have two candidates on a ballot, vote in open primaries, and rank candidates.
Responses
Voters would be able to vote in closed primaries, rank candidates, and have more than two candidates on a ballot.
Voters would be able to vote in closed primaries, rank candidates, and have more than two candidates on a ballot.
Voters would be able to vote in open primaries, have more than two candidates on the ballot, and have the legislature break a tie when necessary.
Voters would be able to vote in open primaries, have more than two candidates on the ballot, and have the legislature break a tie when necessary.
Voters would be able to rank candidates, vote in open primaries, and have more than two candidates on a ballot.
Voters would be able to rank candidates, vote in open primaries, and have more than two candidates on a ballot.
Voters would be able have two candidates on a ballot, vote in open primaries, and rank candidates.
Voters would be able have two candidates on a ballot, vote in open primaries, and rank candidates.
Voters would be able to vote in closed primaries, rank candidates, and have more than two candidates on a ballot.
Which of the following best compares the time frames in which the U.S. Constitution and Nevada Constitution were framed?(1 point)
Responses
The Nevada Constitution was framed more quickly because the U.S. was in a rush to grant them statehood.
The Nevada Constitution was framed more quickly because the U.S. was in a rush to grant them statehood.
The Nevada Constitution was framed more quickly because it was shorter than the U.S. Constitution.
The Nevada Constitution was framed more quickly because it was shorter than the U.S. Constitution.
The Nevada Constitution was framed more quickly because Abraham Lincoln helped write it.
The Nevada Constitution was framed more quickly because Abraham Lincoln helped write it.
The Nevada Constitution was framed more quickly because it was copied from the U.S. Constitution.
Responses
The Nevada Constitution was framed more quickly because the U.S. was in a rush to grant them statehood.
The Nevada Constitution was framed more quickly because the U.S. was in a rush to grant them statehood.
The Nevada Constitution was framed more quickly because it was shorter than the U.S. Constitution.
The Nevada Constitution was framed more quickly because it was shorter than the U.S. Constitution.
The Nevada Constitution was framed more quickly because Abraham Lincoln helped write it.
The Nevada Constitution was framed more quickly because Abraham Lincoln helped write it.
The Nevada Constitution was framed more quickly because it was copied from the U.S. Constitution.
The Nevada Constitution was framed more quickly because the U.S. was in a rush to grant them statehood.
Which of the following best describes the change over time in the relationship between Indigenous tribal governments and the U.S. government?(1 point)
Responses
Initially dominated by sovereign Indigenous tribes, their relationship is now more oriented toward equality.
Initially dominated by sovereign Indigenous tribes, their relationship is now more oriented toward equality.
Initially dominated by the U.S. government, their relationship is now more oriented toward equality.
Initially dominated by the U.S. government, their relationship is now more oriented toward equality.
Initially characterized by equality, their relationship is now more oriented toward the U.S. government.
Initially characterized by equality, their relationship is now more oriented toward the U.S. government.
Initially characterized by equality, their relationship is now more oriented toward Indigenous tribal governments.
Responses
Initially dominated by sovereign Indigenous tribes, their relationship is now more oriented toward equality.
Initially dominated by sovereign Indigenous tribes, their relationship is now more oriented toward equality.
Initially dominated by the U.S. government, their relationship is now more oriented toward equality.
Initially dominated by the U.S. government, their relationship is now more oriented toward equality.
Initially characterized by equality, their relationship is now more oriented toward the U.S. government.
Initially characterized by equality, their relationship is now more oriented toward the U.S. government.
Initially characterized by equality, their relationship is now more oriented toward Indigenous tribal governments.
Initially dominated by sovereign Indigenous tribes, their relationship is now more oriented toward equality.
Which of the following statements is the best critique of the U.S. government’s engagement in treaties with Indigenous Americans?(1 point)
Responses
The U.S. government engaged fairly with Indigenous Americans because they fulfilled the promises made in treaties.
The U.S. government engaged fairly with Indigenous Americans because they fulfilled the promises made in treaties.
The U.S. government engaged unfairly with Indigenous Americans because the U.S. government continuously broke the terms of treaties they entered into with Indigenous Americans.
The U.S. government engaged unfairly with Indigenous Americans because the U.S. government continuously broke the terms of treaties they entered into with Indigenous Americans.
The U.S. government engaged unfairly with Indigenous Americans, because Indigenous Americans were forbidden from adopting customs of White Americans.
The U.S. government engaged unfairly with Indigenous Americans, because Indigenous Americans were forbidden from adopting customs of White Americans.
The U.S. government engaged fairly with Indigenous Americans because Indigenous Americans willingly relocated to new areas to avoid contact with White Americans.
Responses
The U.S. government engaged fairly with Indigenous Americans because they fulfilled the promises made in treaties.
The U.S. government engaged fairly with Indigenous Americans because they fulfilled the promises made in treaties.
The U.S. government engaged unfairly with Indigenous Americans because the U.S. government continuously broke the terms of treaties they entered into with Indigenous Americans.
The U.S. government engaged unfairly with Indigenous Americans because the U.S. government continuously broke the terms of treaties they entered into with Indigenous Americans.
The U.S. government engaged unfairly with Indigenous Americans, because Indigenous Americans were forbidden from adopting customs of White Americans.
The U.S. government engaged unfairly with Indigenous Americans, because Indigenous Americans were forbidden from adopting customs of White Americans.
The U.S. government engaged fairly with Indigenous Americans because Indigenous Americans willingly relocated to new areas to avoid contact with White Americans.
The U.S. government engaged unfairly with Indigenous Americans because the U.S. government continuously broke the terms of treaties they entered into with Indigenous Americans.
1 answer