Which of the following accurately describes a negative effect the supremacy clause has had on federalism in the United States?(1 point)

Question

Responses

The supremacy clause has allowed the Supreme Court to always side with state governments when their policies conflict with those of the national government.
The supremacy clause has allowed the Supreme Court to always side with state governments when their policies conflict with those of the national government.

The supremacy clause has caused the Supreme Court to always side with the national government when its policies conflict with state policies.
The supremacy clause has caused the Supreme Court to always side with the national government when its policies conflict with state policies.

The supremacy clause has increased the power of state governments to create policies that best solve the unique problems of states.
The supremacy clause has increased the power of state governments to create policies that best solve the unique problems of states.

The supremacy clause has led to states being unable to exercise a valid state power when it conflicts with a valid power exercised by the national government.

Answer 1

The response that accurately describes a negative effect the supremacy clause has had on federalism in the United States is:

The supremacy clause has led to states being unable to exercise a valid state power when it conflicts with a valid power exercised by the national government.

This option highlights how the supremacy clause can limit the ability of states to implement their own policies when those policies conflict with federal laws or regulations.