The best interpretation of the two flat portions of the graph, where thermal energy does not exist, would be the segments where changes of state are occurring.
During changes of state (such as melting or boiling), the energy input does not result in an increase in temperature. Instead, it is used to break the intermolecular forces holding the particles together. As a result, the temperature remains constant but the energy is being absorbed by the substance to facilitate the phase transition.
On the other hand, the segment where kinetic energy is increasing would be the steep upward slope on the graph. As energy is added to a substance, the average kinetic energy of its particles increases, leading to an increase in temperature. This is represented by a positive gradient or slope on the graph.
It is important to note that the concept of "where the temperature is zero" doesn't align with the provided graph. In most scenarios, a temperature of zero Kelvin (-273.15 degrees Celsius) is not achievable, as it represents absolute zero, where molecular motion ceases entirely.
Which is the best interpretation of the two flat portions of the graph you show where thermal energy does not exist do you show where kinetic energy is increasing the show where the temperature is zero do you show where changes of state are occurring
1 answer