Genocide is defined as "the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial, or religious group." Based on this definition, the atrocity crime that can be defined as genocide among the four mentioned examples is the genocide in Rwanda.
During the Rwandan Genocide in 1994, Hutu extremists targeted the Tutsi ethnic group, as well as moderate Hutus, resulting in the mass killing of approximately 800,000 people in just 100 days. This targeted and systematic extermination of a specific ethnic group clearly aligns with the definition of genocide.
In contrast, the atrocities in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Sudan, and South Sudan involved conflicts and violence against various groups, but they may not meet the specific criteria of intent to destroy the group in whole or in part as seen in the case of Rwanda. For example, the conflicts in the Democratic Republic of the Congo have been characterized by ethnic tensions and resource-driven violence, while the conflicts in Sudan and South Sudan have been driven by political and territorial disputes.
Therefore, out of the four mentioned examples, the atrocity crime that can be defined as genocide is the genocide in Rwanda due to its clear intent to destroy a specific ethnic group.
Which, if any, of the four atrocity crimes that you read about, would you define as
? Explain your answer by including examples from the atrocity crimes that you read about and refence the definition of genocide. Rwanda, The Democratic republic of the congo, sudan, and south sudan.
1 answer
1 answer