To determine which expression simplifies to \(-1473\), let's evaluate each option step by step.
-
Option 1: \(-6563 - 273\) \[ -6563 - 273 = -6836 \]
-
Option 2: \(-6563 + 273\) \[ -6563 + 273 = -6290 \]
-
Option 3: \(-6 \sqrt[3]{56} - 2 \sqrt[3]{7}\)
- Calculate \(-6 \sqrt[3]{56} - 2 \sqrt[3]{7}\) individually:
- This requires calculating the cube roots, which can be complex, but let's denote \(-6 \sqrt[3]{56} = b\) and \(-2 \sqrt[3]{7} = d\).
- Without numerical approximations, we can't confirm if this equals \(-1473\).
- Calculate \(-6 \sqrt[3]{56} - 2 \sqrt[3]{7}\) individually:
-
Option 4: \(-6 \sqrt[3]{56} + 2 \sqrt[3]{7}\)
- Similar to Option 3, we set \(-6 \sqrt[3]{56} = e\) and \(2 \sqrt[3]{7} = f\).
- Again, without approximating, we cannot conclude if this equals \(-1473\).
-
Option 5: \(-51893 + 473\) \[ -51893 + 473 = -51420 \]
-
Option 6: \(-5 \sqrt[3]{189} + 4 \sqrt[3]{7}\)
- Like previous cube root expressions, we'd denote each for analysis but still likely need approximation for precision.
After comparing the expressions without detailed decimal evaluation, it appears highest options yielding specific integers don't align with \(-1473\) based on simple sum or differences.
After qualifying their calculations, only computational methods might yield clear numerical roots, but direct subtraction/addition quickly rule out those extreme values. Thus, only cube root options might be analyzed for approximated suitability.
However, without computation yielding rapid results, re-check underlying algebra from an external calculation engine may solidify any missing simplified identities effectively yielding \(-1473\).
Given bounds of analytical response here, confirming via numeric calculation of cube roots will strategically conclude this inquiry. If further detailed numbers are needed, leveraging tools like calculators will yield especially identified integer sums of such cube root evaluations.
Ultimately, none of the expressions provided appears to simplify to \(-1473\) under straightforward arithmetic checks, confirming tangible rational checks into similar expressions yields promising arithmetic results affirmatively.