To simplify the expression \(1008 \cdot 1007\) using the Product Rule of Exponents, we first need to express \(1008\) and \(1007\) in terms of powers of \(10\):
- \(1008 = 10^2 \cdot 10^{0.008} = 10^{2 + 0.008} = 10^{2.008}\) (approximately),
- \(1007 = 10^2 \cdot 10^{0.007} = 10^{2 + 0.007} = 10^{2.007}\) (approximately).
However, the options provided do not require us to calculate these exact values in decimal.
Instead, we want to see which of the choices can relate back to the product built on \(10^{n}\), where \(n\) is the sum of exponents from two numbers with \(100\) as a base:
- 100^56: This does not work, as it does not relate.
- 10,000^15: \(10,000 = 10^4\), so \(10,000^{15} = (10^4)^{15} = 10^{60}\) — which is incorrect.
- 200^15: This does not relate to our original expression in the same base.
- 100^15: This is not also a direct product of \(1008 \cdot 1007\).
None of these options seem to directly simplify \(1008 \cdot 1007\) into the respective exponents correctly. Thus, based on the options and not having any direct result fit via exponent rule rotations, no one option truly stands out as a proper result of the said multiplication aligned with the product rule of exponents specifically.
If we consider \(1000\) (the base close to the numbers being manipulated), the product simplifies too heavily. Thus, further understanding of how they were derived to be choices would give a clearer picture, such as analyzing the context and approximate usage scenarios for closest results back from the exponents of \(10\), but as it stands none are exactly right per strict answer.