Which could make a source unreliable?(1 point)

Responses

A group of non-experts disagrees with the data published in an article.
A group of non-experts disagrees with the data published in an article. - no response given

There is an inaccurate fact on a page of an article.
There is an inaccurate fact on a page of an article. - incorrect

There are some typos in an article.
There are some typos in an article. - no response given

Only non-experts corroborate the data in an article.
Only non-experts corroborate the data in an article. - no response given
Incorrect

The existence of an inaccuracy does not necessarily make a source unreliable.
Remaining Attempts : 2

1 answer

The most definitive reason that could make a source unreliable among the provided options is:

There is an inaccurate fact on a page of an article.

An inaccuracy can undermine the credibility of the entire source, as it raises questions about the validity of the information presented. Typos and non-expert corroboration might lessen credibility, but they do not inherently make the source unreliable in the same way that factual inaccuracies do.

Similar Questions
  1. Which could make a source unreliable?(1 point)Responses A group of non-experts disagrees with the data published in an article.
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  2. Which could make a source unreliable?(1 point)Responses A group of non-experts disagrees with the data published in an article.
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  3. Which could make a source unreliable?(1 point)Responses Only non-experts corroborate the data in an article. Only non-experts
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  4. Which could make a source unreliable?(1 point)Responses Only non-experts corroborate the data in an article. Only non-experts
    1. answers icon 1 answer
more similar questions