To determine which conclusion is best supported by the map, we would need to examine the specific features presented in the map regarding the Aztec Empire and the Olmec civilization, particularly in relation to geography, landforms, and food production methods.
Based on typical historical knowledge, here are some insights regarding each option:
a. The Aztec Empire conquered the Olmec civilization. - This statement may not be well-supported, as the Olmec civilization predates the Aztec Empire and was already in decline by the time the Aztecs rose to power.
b. The Olmec civilization depended on slash-and-burn. - This could be supported if the map indicates areas of tropical rainforest or shows agricultural practices typical of Mesoamerican cultures.
c. The Aztec Empire expanded across a variety of landforms. - If the map showcases diverse geographic features (mountains, valleys, lakes), this conclusion could be valid.
d. Food production was easier for the Aztecs than it was for the Olmecs. - This would depend on specific agricultural features represented on the map. The Aztecs developed innovative agricultural techniques like chinampas, which might suggest easier food production.
Without seeing the specific map, it is difficult to definitively conclude which option is best supported. However, if the map shows varied landforms and highlights the agricultural practices of both civilizations, option c could be the most accurate interpretation. Therefore, the Aztec Empire expanded across a variety of landforms (c) would likely be the best-supported conclusion, assuming the map indicates such variation.