To answer the question accurately, we would need more context regarding the student's findings related to the antibiotic's effectiveness against the bacteria from her shoe. However, let's analyze the options based on potential scenarios:
-
A. The antibiotic was never effective. This claim suggests that the antibiotic did not impact the bacteria at any point, which may not be accurate unless there is clear evidence for this.
-
B. The antibiotic was always effective. This claim implies consistent effectiveness, which might not be true if there were fluctuations observed in effectiveness.
-
C. The antibiotic was effective at first, but lost its effectiveness over time. This claim indicates a diminishing effect of the antibiotic, which is a common occurrence with antibiotic resistance.
-
D. The antibiotic was not effective at first, but gained effectiveness over time. This claim would suggest an unusual scenario where resistance is overcome or that the bacteria became more susceptible, which is less common.
Without additional context, option C would often be the most plausible claim if there is a scenario where the bacteria became resistant over time, which frequently happens with antibiotics.
Would you like me to assist you further with additional details?